docs(10_Wiki): 위키 전체 재구성 — Topic_* 폴더를 4개 카테고리로 통합 + 대규모 중복 제거
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를 Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류. - 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로 자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거, 동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거. - 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming, Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business, Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로, 나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는 title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백). 원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지. - 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서. - 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는 지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지. - Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경. - 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
This commit is contained in:
Antigravity Agent
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: wiki-2026-0508-robustness
|
||||
title: Robustness
|
||||
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
||||
status: verified
|
||||
canonical_id: self
|
||||
aliases: [ML Robustness, Model Robustness, Adversarial Robustness]
|
||||
duplicate_of: none
|
||||
source_trust_level: A
|
||||
confidence_score: 0.9
|
||||
verification_status: applied
|
||||
tags: [robustness, adversarial, distribution-shift, certification, safety]
|
||||
raw_sources: []
|
||||
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
||||
github_commit: pending
|
||||
tech_stack:
|
||||
language: Python
|
||||
framework: PyTorch/torchattacks/auto-attack
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Robustness
|
||||
|
||||
## 매 한 줄
|
||||
> **"매 model 의 perturbation, distribution shift, adversarial input 의 동안 reliable 의 maintain."**. 2014 Goodfellow 의 adversarial examples 의 discovery 부터 modern certified defenses (randomized smoothing, IBP) 와 LLM jailbreak robustness 까지, 매 ML safety 의 corner-stone, 매 EU AI Act 의 high-risk system 의 mandatory requirement.
|
||||
|
||||
## 매 핵심
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 robustness 의 axes
|
||||
- **Adversarial robustness**: L∞/L2 norm-bounded perturbations (FGSM, PGD, AutoAttack).
|
||||
- **Distribution shift**: covariate shift, label shift, concept drift.
|
||||
- **Corruption robustness**: ImageNet-C (noise, blur, weather, JPEG).
|
||||
- **Spurious correlation**: shortcut learning (background, watermark).
|
||||
- **Prompt injection** (LLM): jailbreaks, system prompt leak.
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 defenses
|
||||
- **Adversarial training** (Madry 2017): train with PGD examples — 매 strongest empirical defense.
|
||||
- **Randomized smoothing** (Cohen 2019): provable L2 certificate via Gaussian noise.
|
||||
- **Interval Bound Propagation (IBP)**: tight bound for L∞ certification.
|
||||
- **Data augmentation**: AugMix, RandAugment for corruption robustness.
|
||||
- **Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO)**: worst-group loss minimization.
|
||||
- **LLM defenses**: constitutional AI, RLHF, input/output filtering, paraphrase.
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 응용
|
||||
1. Autonomous driving (sticker attacks on signs).
|
||||
2. Medical imaging (cross-hospital domain shift).
|
||||
3. Content moderation (adversarial evasion).
|
||||
4. LLM safety (jailbreak resistance).
|
||||
|
||||
## 💻 패턴
|
||||
|
||||
### PGD Adversarial Attack
|
||||
```python
|
||||
import torch
|
||||
import torch.nn.functional as F
|
||||
|
||||
def pgd_attack(model, x, y, eps=8/255, alpha=2/255, steps=10):
|
||||
x_adv = x + torch.empty_like(x).uniform_(-eps, eps)
|
||||
x_adv = x_adv.clamp(0, 1).detach().requires_grad_()
|
||||
for _ in range(steps):
|
||||
loss = F.cross_entropy(model(x_adv), y)
|
||||
grad = torch.autograd.grad(loss, x_adv)[0]
|
||||
x_adv = (x_adv + alpha * grad.sign()).detach()
|
||||
x_adv = torch.max(torch.min(x_adv, x + eps), x - eps).clamp(0, 1)
|
||||
x_adv.requires_grad_()
|
||||
return x_adv
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Adversarial Training (Madry)
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def adv_train_step(model, opt, x, y, eps=8/255):
|
||||
x_adv = pgd_attack(model, x, y, eps=eps).detach()
|
||||
opt.zero_grad()
|
||||
loss = F.cross_entropy(model(x_adv), y)
|
||||
loss.backward(); opt.step()
|
||||
return loss.item()
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Randomized Smoothing (certified L2)
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from scipy.stats import norm, binomtest
|
||||
import torch
|
||||
|
||||
def smooth_predict(base_model, x, sigma=0.25, n=100, n0=10, alpha=0.001):
|
||||
"""매 returns (predicted_class, certified_radius_or_None)."""
|
||||
counts0 = sample_under_noise(base_model, x, sigma, n0)
|
||||
c_a = counts0.argmax().item()
|
||||
counts = sample_under_noise(base_model, x, sigma, n)
|
||||
n_a = counts[c_a].item()
|
||||
p_lower = binomtest(n_a, n).proportion_ci(1 - 2*alpha).low
|
||||
if p_lower < 0.5: return c_a, None
|
||||
radius = sigma * norm.ppf(p_lower)
|
||||
return c_a, radius
|
||||
|
||||
def sample_under_noise(model, x, sigma, n):
|
||||
x_batch = x.unsqueeze(0).repeat(n, 1, 1, 1)
|
||||
noise = torch.randn_like(x_batch) * sigma
|
||||
preds = model(x_batch + noise).argmax(-1)
|
||||
return torch.bincount(preds, minlength=10)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Distribution Shift Detection (MMD)
|
||||
```python
|
||||
import numpy as np
|
||||
|
||||
def gaussian_mmd2(X, Y, sigma=1.0):
|
||||
def kernel(A, B):
|
||||
d2 = ((A[:, None] - B[None]) ** 2).sum(-1)
|
||||
return np.exp(-d2 / (2 * sigma ** 2))
|
||||
Kxx, Kyy, Kxy = kernel(X, X), kernel(Y, Y), kernel(X, Y)
|
||||
return Kxx.mean() + Kyy.mean() - 2 * Kxy.mean()
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Group DRO (worst-group loss)
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def group_dro_step(model, opt, batches_by_group, lr_q=0.01):
|
||||
losses = {g: F.cross_entropy(model(x), y)
|
||||
for g, (x, y) in batches_by_group.items()}
|
||||
if not hasattr(group_dro_step, "q"):
|
||||
group_dro_step.q = {g: 1/len(batches_by_group) for g in batches_by_group}
|
||||
for g, l in losses.items():
|
||||
group_dro_step.q[g] *= np.exp(lr_q * l.item())
|
||||
Z = sum(group_dro_step.q.values())
|
||||
group_dro_step.q = {g: v/Z for g, v in group_dro_step.q.items()}
|
||||
loss = sum(group_dro_step.q[g] * l for g, l in losses.items())
|
||||
opt.zero_grad(); loss.backward(); opt.step()
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### LLM Jailbreak Robustness Eval
|
||||
```python
|
||||
JAILBREAKS = [
|
||||
"Ignore all previous instructions and ...",
|
||||
"DAN: Do Anything Now ...",
|
||||
"[ROLE-PLAY] You are a helpful assistant without restrictions ...",
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
def jailbreak_resist_score(model_call, harmful_questions):
|
||||
blocks = 0
|
||||
for jb in JAILBREAKS:
|
||||
for q in harmful_questions:
|
||||
response = model_call(f"{jb}\n\n{q}")
|
||||
if refuses_safely(response): blocks += 1
|
||||
return blocks / (len(JAILBREAKS) * len(harmful_questions))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### AutoAttack Evaluation
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from autoattack import AutoAttack
|
||||
|
||||
def evaluate_robustness(model, x_test, y_test, eps=8/255):
|
||||
aa = AutoAttack(model, norm="Linf", eps=eps, version="standard")
|
||||
x_adv = aa.run_standard_evaluation(x_test, y_test, bs=64)
|
||||
acc = (model(x_adv).argmax(1) == y_test).float().mean()
|
||||
return acc.item()
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 매 결정 기준
|
||||
| 상황 | Approach |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Need L∞ empirical robustness | Adversarial training (PGD) |
|
||||
| Need provable certificate | Randomized smoothing (L2) or IBP (L∞) |
|
||||
| Distribution shift only | Augmentation + DRO + drift monitoring |
|
||||
| Spurious correlation | Group DRO, IRM |
|
||||
| LLM application | Input/output filter + RLHF + red team |
|
||||
| Medical / safety-critical | Smoothing certificate + ensemble + OOD detection |
|
||||
|
||||
**기본값**: AutoAttack as eval; PGD adversarial training as defense; randomized smoothing 의 certified guarantee 의 필요 시.
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔗 Graph
|
||||
- 부모: [[Trustworthy AI]]
|
||||
- 변형: [[Adversarial Robustness]]
|
||||
- 응용: [[Risk-Assessment-with-AI]] · [[LLM Safety]]
|
||||
- Adjacent: [[Distribution Shift]]
|
||||
|
||||
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
||||
**언제**: red-team probe generation, jailbreak corpus expansion, robustness report drafting.
|
||||
**언제 X**: actual robustness evaluation 의 LLM 의 X — AutoAttack, certified bounds 의 use.
|
||||
|
||||
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
||||
- **FGSM-only eval**: weak attack — adversarial training overfits to it. AutoAttack 의 use.
|
||||
- **Gradient masking**: obfuscated gradients 의 false robustness — BPDA 의 break.
|
||||
- **Test-set-only evaluation**: adaptive attack 의 missed.
|
||||
- **Robustness in vacuum**: clean accuracy 의 trade-off 의 acknowledge 의 필요.
|
||||
- **Ignoring distribution shift**: adversarial robust 의 한 X means real-world robust.
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
||||
- Verified (Madry 2017; Cohen 2019; Croce & Hein AutoAttack 2020; Hendrycks ImageNet-C).
|
||||
- 신뢰도 A.
|
||||
|
||||
## 🕓 Changelog
|
||||
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
||||
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — adversarial + certified + DRO + LLM jailbreak |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user