docs(10_Wiki): 위키 전체 재구성 — Topic_* 폴더를 4개 카테고리로 통합 + 대규모 중복 제거

Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를
Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류.

- 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로
  자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거,
  동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거.
- 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming,
  Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business,
  Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로,
  나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는
  title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백).
  원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지.
- 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서.
- 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는
  지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지.
- Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경.
- 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
This commit is contained in:
Antigravity Agent
2026-07-05 00:33:48 +09:00
parent 1cfd3bbb56
commit 9148c358d0
6455 changed files with 1 additions and 86875 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
---
id: wiki-2026-0508-cognitive-evaluation-theory
title: Cognitive Evaluation Theory (Self-Determination)
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
status: verified
canonical_id: self
aliases: [self-determination theory, SDT, autonomy, competence, relatedness, intrinsic motivation, over-justification]
duplicate_of: none
source_trust_level: A
confidence_score: 0.88
verification_status: applied
tags: [psychology, motivation, sdt, intrinsic-motivation, gamification, game-design, education, productivity]
raw_sources: []
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
github_commit: pending
tech_stack:
language: psychology
applicable_to: [Game Design, Education, Workplace, Product UX]
---
# Cognitive Evaluation Theory / SDT
## 매 한 줄
> **"매 reward 의 sometimes 의 passion 의 kill"**. Deci & Ryan 의 SDT (Self-Determination Theory) 의 sub-theory. 매 autonomy + competence + relatedness 의 3 의 intrinsic motivation 의 fuel. 매 modern gamification, 매 education, 매 product UX 의 base.
## 매 핵심
### Self-Determination Theory 의 3 needs
1. **Autonomy**: 매 self-chosen.
2. **Competence**: 매 mastery feel.
3. **Relatedness**: 매 connection.
→ 매 3 의 satisfy = 매 intrinsic motivation.
### Intrinsic vs Extrinsic
- **Intrinsic**: 매 enjoyment / interest 의 itself.
- **Extrinsic**: 매 reward / punishment.
- **Internalization**: 매 extrinsic 의 internalize 의 spectrum.
### Over-justification effect (Lepper)
- 매 paid for activity 의 enjoy → 매 intrinsic 의 lose.
- 매 famous: 매 kid drawing experiment.
- 매 implication: 매 reward 의 careful design.
### 매 reward 의 effect
| Type | Effect |
|---|---|
| Tangible + expected | 매 intrinsic ↓ |
| Verbal positive | 매 intrinsic ↑ |
| Unexpected | 매 less harmful |
| Task-contingent | 매 intrinsic ↓ |
| Performance-contingent (informative) | 매 mid |
| Choice-supportive | 매 intrinsic ↑ |
### 매 application
#### Game design
- **Autonomy**: 매 quest choice, 매 customization.
- **Competence**: 매 progression, 매 skill curve.
- **Relatedness**: 매 multiplayer, 매 guild.
#### Education
- **Autonomy**: 매 project topic choice.
- **Competence**: 매 scaffolded difficulty.
- **Relatedness**: 매 peer collab.
#### Workplace
- **Autonomy**: 매 schedule, 매 method.
- **Competence**: 매 challenging task + feedback.
- **Relatedness**: 매 team belonging.
#### Product UX
- **Autonomy**: 매 customization, 매 control.
- **Competence**: 매 onboarding 의 mastery.
- **Relatedness**: 매 social feature.
### 매 dark side (anti-pattern)
- 매 tangible reward 의 dominate (cash, gift card).
- 매 surveillance / monitoring → autonomy ↓.
- 매 forced ranking → relatedness ↓.
- 매 over-difficult / under-difficult → competence ↓.
### 매 modern AI 의 의미
- **AI assistant**: 매 user 의 competence 의 reduce 의 risk.
- **Recommendation**: 매 autonomy 의 illusion vs reality.
- **Gamification**: 매 manipulation 의 risk (dark pattern).
- **Productivity tracker**: 매 surveillance.
## 💻 패턴 (응용)
### Game progression (autonomy + competence)
```ts
class QuestSystem {
// 매 autonomy: 매 player 의 choose
getAvailableQuests(player) {
return this.quests.filter(q =>
q.unlock(player) &&
!q.completed(player)
); // 매 multiple option
}
// 매 competence: 매 skill curve
recommendNextQuest(player) {
const available = this.getAvailableQuests(player);
const skillLevel = player.estimatedSkill();
// 매 zone of proximal development
return available
.filter(q => q.difficulty >= skillLevel - 1 && q.difficulty <= skillLevel + 2)
.sort((a, b) => a.difficulty - b.difficulty)[0];
}
}
```
### Workplace autonomy (4-day workweek-style)
```python
def autonomy_audit(team):
return {
'schedule_flexibility': measure(team, 'self-set start/end times'),
'method_flexibility': measure(team, 'choose how to solve'),
'topic_flexibility': measure(team, 'pick what to work on'),
'tool_flexibility': measure(team, 'choose tools'),
'location_flexibility': measure(team, 'remote / hybrid'),
}
```
### Educational scaffolding (competence)
```python
def adaptive_difficulty(student, current_skill, performance):
"""매 zone of proximal development."""
if performance > 0.85:
return current_skill + 1 # 매 challenge ↑
elif performance < 0.5:
return current_skill - 1 # 매 ease
return current_skill # 매 stable
```
### Avoid over-justification (verbal > tangible)
```python
def reward_employee(employee, accomplishment):
# 매 ❌ Tangible + expected (e.g., $100 for X)
# 매 ✅ Verbal + specific
feedback = f"""
{employee.name}, your work on {accomplishment.project} was excellent.
Specifically, your approach to {accomplishment.specific_thing} showed
{accomplishment.competence_demonstrated}. This had {accomplishment.impact}.
"""
# 매 unexpected appreciation 의 OK
if random.random() < 0.1:
send_appreciation_card(employee, feedback)
return feedback
```
### Recommendation system 의 autonomy preserve
```python
def recommend_with_autonomy(user, items):
"""매 explainability + 매 user control."""
recommendations = ml_model.recommend(user, items)
return {
'items': recommendations,
'why': explain_each(recommendations, user), # 매 transparency
'controls': {
'less_of_this': lambda item: user.feedback_negative(item),
'more_of_this': lambda item: user.feedback_positive(item),
'turn_off_personalization': lambda: user.toggle_personalization(False),
},
}
```
### Mastery curve (competence)
```python
def mastery_journey(skill):
return [
('Novice', 'Hand-holding tutorial', 'high feedback'),
('Advanced Beginner', 'Guided practice', 'frequent feedback'),
('Competent', 'Independent task', 'less feedback'),
('Proficient', 'Complex challenge', 'occasional feedback'),
('Expert', 'Mastery + teaching', 'self-feedback'),
]
```
### Anti-surveillance (autonomy)
```python
# 매 ❌ Productivity tracker showing keystrokes
# 매 ✅ Self-tracker only the user sees
class SelfProductivityTracker:
"""매 user-only, opt-in."""
def __init__(self, user_id):
self.user_id = user_id
self.private = True # 매 not shared with manager
def log_focus_session(self, duration):
self.sessions.append({'duration': duration, 'date': now()})
def insights(self):
# 매 user 의 only
return generate_insights(self.sessions)
```
## 🤔 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Game | Autonomy (quest choice) + Competence (curve) + Relatedness (multiplayer) |
| Education | Project choice + scaffolded + peer |
| Workplace | Schedule + method + team |
| Product onboard | Mastery feel + control |
| Reward | Verbal + unexpected > tangible expected |
| Productivity tool | Self-tracker > surveillance |
**기본값**: 매 3 needs 의 audit + 매 reward design 의 careful.
## 🔗 Graph
- 부모: [[Psychology]] · [[Motivation]] · [[Behavioral-Economics]]
- 변형: [[Self-Determination-Theory]] · [[Flow_State|Flow-State]]
- 응용: [[Gamification]] · [[Game-Design]] · [[UX]]
- Adjacent: [[Cognitive Biases]] · [[Addiction Neuroscience]] · [[Authenticity]] · [[Anthropomorphism]]
## 🤖 LLM 활용
**언제**: 매 motivation design. 매 game design. 매 education tool. 매 workplace policy. 매 product UX.
**언제 X**: 매 manipulation / dark pattern.
## ❌ 안티패턴
- **Tangible expected reward 의 default**: 매 intrinsic 의 kill.
- **Cash for fun**: 매 over-justification.
- **Surveillance + autonomy 의 claim**: 매 violation.
- **Difficulty curve X**: 매 competence ↓.
- **No social feature** (suitable game): 매 relatedness X.
- **Dark pattern (FOMO, sunk cost)**: 매 ethics violation.
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Deci-Ryan SDT, Pink "Drive", Lepper over-justification).
- 신뢰도 A.
- Related: [[Cognitive Biases]] · [[Addiction Neuroscience]] · [[Game-Design]] · [[Authenticity]] · [[Bounded_Rationality|Bounded-Rationality]].
## 🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — 3 needs + over-justification + 매 quest / autonomy / mastery code |