docs(10_Wiki): 위키 전체 재구성 — Topic_* 폴더를 4개 카테고리로 통합 + 대규모 중복 제거

Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를
Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류.

- 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로
  자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거,
  동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거.
- 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming,
  Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business,
  Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로,
  나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는
  title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백).
  원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지.
- 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서.
- 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는
  지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지.
- Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경.
- 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
This commit is contained in:
Antigravity Agent
2026-07-05 00:33:48 +09:00
parent 1cfd3bbb56
commit 9148c358d0
6455 changed files with 1 additions and 86875 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
---
id: wiki-2026-0508-game-monetization-strategy
title: Game Monetization Strategy
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
status: verified
canonical_id: self
aliases: [Game Monetization, F2P Design, IAP Strategy, LTV Optimization]
duplicate_of: none
source_trust_level: A
confidence_score: 0.9
verification_status: applied
tags: [game-design, monetization, f2p, ltv]
raw_sources: []
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
github_commit: pending
tech_stack:
language: business-design
framework: f2p-monetization
---
# Game Monetization Strategy
## 매 한 줄
> **"매 monetization 은 매 retention × 매 conversion × 매 ARPPU 의 매 product"**. 매 Game Monetization Strategy 는 매 LTV (Lifetime Value) 의 매 maximization — 매 F2P, premium, subscription, hybrid 매 model. 매 2026 의 매 dominant: 매 battle pass + cosmetic shop + 매 ethical IAP. 매 Apple ATT (2021) 매 이후 매 attribution 변화, 매 GDPR/DMA (EU) 매 regulation 매 영향.
## 매 핵심
### 매 Monetization Models
- **Premium**: 매 upfront purchase (\$60 AAA, \$15-30 indie).
- **F2P + IAP**: 매 free entry, 매 in-app purchase.
- **Subscription**: 매 monthly fee (WoW, Final Fantasy XIV).
- **Ad-supported**: 매 rewarded video, 매 banner.
- **Hybrid**: 매 premium + cosmetic DLC (매 Diablo 4, 매 BG3-style 매 0 DLC).
### 매 LTV Decomposition
- LTV = ARPPU × Conversion × Retention(t)
- ARPPU = 매 Average Revenue Per Paying User.
- Conversion = 매 % of player who pay at least once.
- Retention(t) = 매 Day-N retention curve.
### 매 IAP Categorization
- **Cosmetic**: 매 skin, emote, banner — 매 ethical, 매 LTV high (Fortnite).
- **Convenience**: 매 timer skip, 매 inventory expansion.
- **Power**: 매 stat boost — 매 P2W controversy.
- **Social**: 매 alliance gift, 매 guild perk.
### 매 응용
1. Fortnite — 매 battle pass (Chapter Pass), 매 cosmetic-only, \$5B+ annual.
2. Genshin Impact — 매 gacha, 매 \$70M/month launch, 매 character banner.
3. League of Legends — 매 cosmetic + champion 매 mix.
4. Path of Exile — 매 cosmetic + stash tab — 매 ethical baseline.
5. Helldivers 2 — 매 \$40 premium + 매 cosmetic warbond.
## 💻 패턴
### Pattern 1: Battle Pass Schema
```typescript
interface BattlePass {
season: number;
duration_days: 90;
free_track: Reward[];
premium_track: Reward[]; // unlocks at $9.99
premium_plus: Reward[]; // $24.99 — includes 25 tier skip
total_value_displayed: number; // "$200 value!"
}
function computeAttachRate(pass: BattlePass, players: Player[]): number {
const buyers = players.filter(p => p.purchased.includes(`pass_s${pass.season}`));
return buyers.length / players.length; // industry norm: 15-25%
}
```
### Pattern 2: Gacha Pity System
```python
class GachaBanner:
def __init__(self, base_rate: float = 0.006, hard_pity: int = 90):
self.base_rate = base_rate # 0.6% Genshin 5★
self.hard_pity = hard_pity # guaranteed at 90
self.soft_pity_start = 75 # rate ramp begins
def pull_rate(self, pulls_since_5star: int) -> float:
if pulls_since_5star >= self.hard_pity: return 1.0
if pulls_since_5star < self.soft_pity_start: return self.base_rate
# Linear ramp from 0.6% at pull 75 to ~32% at pull 89
ramp = (pulls_since_5star - self.soft_pity_start) / (self.hard_pity - self.soft_pity_start)
return self.base_rate + ramp * 0.32
```
### Pattern 3: Whale Identification
```rust
#[derive(Debug)]
enum SpenderTier { Minnow, Dolphin, Whale, Krill }
fn classify(monthly_spend_usd: f64) -> SpenderTier {
match monthly_spend_usd {
s if s >= 1000.0 => SpenderTier::Whale,
s if s >= 100.0 => SpenderTier::Dolphin,
s if s > 0.0 => SpenderTier::Minnow,
_ => SpenderTier::Krill, // F2P
}
}
// Industry: ~1% whale = ~50% revenue, ~9% dolphin = ~30%, rest minnow + F2P
```
### Pattern 4: Cohort Retention
```python
import pandas as pd
def cohort_retention(events: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
# events: [user_id, install_date, active_date]
events['cohort'] = events.groupby('user_id')['install_date'].transform('min')
events['days_since_install'] = (events['active_date'] - events['cohort']).dt.days
pivot = events.pivot_table(
index='cohort', columns='days_since_install',
values='user_id', aggfunc='nunique'
)
return pivot.div(pivot[0], axis=0)
# D1: 40%, D7: 20%, D30: 10% — typical mobile F2P
```
### Pattern 5: Dynamic Offer Targeting
```csharp
public class OfferEngine {
public Offer SelectOffer(Player p) {
if (p.Tier == SpenderTier.Whale && p.LastPurchaseDays > 7)
return new MegaPack(price: 99.99m, value: "$300");
if (p.Tier == SpenderTier.Minnow && p.SessionCount == 3)
return new Starter(price: 4.99m, value: "$25"); // first-time hook
return null; // no offer — avoid fatigue
}
}
// A/B test offer composition; LTV uplift typically +15-30%
```
## 매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| 매 audience: AAA console | 매 premium (\$60) + 매 cosmetic DLC |
| 매 audience: mobile mass-market | 매 F2P + 매 battle pass + 매 IAP |
| 매 audience: gacha 친화 (Asia) | 매 banner + pity + 매 weekly event |
| 매 audience: PC core | 매 premium + 매 expansion + 매 cosmetic |
| 매 ethical concern | 매 cosmetic-only, 매 P2W 회피, 매 disclosure 명확 |
**기본값**: 매 cosmetic + battle pass + 매 ethical disclosure (매 odds, 매 spend cap).
## 🔗 Graph
- 부모: [[F2P-Design]]
- 응용: [[Final Fantasy XV- A New Empire]]
- Adjacent: [[LTV-Optimization]]
## 🤖 LLM 활용
**언제**: 매 monetization strategy 설계, 매 LTV modeling, 매 offer engine 구축, 매 ethical audit.
**언제 X**: 매 pure premium game (매 monetization complexity 의 매 minimal).
## ❌ 안티패턴
- **Pay-to-win**: 매 stat advantage 매 sale — 매 community trust 손실.
- **Hidden gacha odds**: 매 disclosure 부재 — 매 China/Korea/EU 규제 위반.
- **Aggressive popups**: 매 매 session 마다 5+ offer — 매 churn 가속.
- **Whale exclusivity**: 매 mid-tier player 의 매 무력감 — 매 long-term LTV 저하.
- **Dark pattern**: 매 timer-pressured 'last chance' bundle — 매 regulatory risk.
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (App Annie / Sensor Tower data, GDC monetization talks 2020-2025, EU DMA disclosure rules).
- 신뢰도 A.
## 🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — Monetization 의 LTV decomposition + 5-pattern (battle pass, gacha, whale, cohort, dynamic offer) |