docs: finalized wiki integrity maintenance (v3.0 standard) - pruned 1400+ stubs and fixed 11k+ ghost links

This commit is contained in:
Antigravity Agent
2026-05-02 09:18:34 +09:00
parent c84dcb8371
commit 6445fcc05b
13150 changed files with 55394 additions and 100862 deletions
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
[[Papers, Please (Mechanics as Moral Argument)]]
[[Papers, Please (Mechanics as Moral Argument)|Papers, Please (Mechanics as Moral Argument)]]
📌 Brief Summary
This topic explores the ludonarrative phenomenon in Lucas Pope's *Papers, Please*, where gameplay mechanics—specifically repetitive, high-stress administrative tasks—function as a primary vehicle for moral argumentation. Rather than relying on cinematic cutscenes, the game utilizes "procedural rhetoric" to force players into ethical dilemmas through the friction of bureaucratic efficiency and economic survival.
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ This topic explores the ludonarrative phenomenon in Lucas Pope's *Papers, Please
* **Economic Determinism and Agency:** The game utilizes a survival mechanic (the budget/ledger) to constrain player agency. By making the cost of failure (starvation/death of family members) tangible, the game argues that morality is often a luxury afforded only to those not under extreme economic duress. This transforms the moral argument from an abstract philosophical debate into a practical struggle for survival.
🔗 Knowledge Connections
* Related Topics: [[Procedural Rhetoric]], [[Ludonarrative Dissonance]], [[Systems Thinking in Game Design]], [[The Ethics of Bureaucracy]]
* Projects/Contexts: [[Lucas Pope's Works]], [[Game Studies (Ludology)]], [[Simulations of Totalitarianism]]
* Related Topics: [[Procedural Rhetoric|Procedural Rhetoric]], [[Ludonarrative Dissonance|Ludonarrative Dissonance]], Systems Thinking in Game Design, The Ethics of Bureaucracy
* Projects/Contexts: Lucas Pope's Works, Game Studies (Ludology), Simulations of Totalitarianism
* Contradictions/Notes: Some scholars argue that the "survival" mechanic can overshadow the political critique by reducing moral choices to mere resource management; however, most contemporary research views this integration as the game's defining strength.
Last updated: 2026-04-16