docs: finalized wiki integrity maintenance (v3.0 standard) - pruned 1400+ stubs and fixed 11k+ ghost links
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
[[Game Studies (Ludology vs. Narratology)]]
|
||||
[[Game Studies (Ludology vs. Narratology)|Game Studies (Ludology vs. Narratology)]]
|
||||
|
||||
📌 Brief Summary
|
||||
The Ludology vs. Narratology debate refers to a foundational theoretical conflict in early game studies regarding the ontological nature of video games. It questions whether games should be analyzed primarily as systems of rules and mechanics (Ludology) or as structured storytelling media comparable to literature and film (Narratology).
|
||||
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ The Ludology vs. Narratology debate refers to a foundational theoretical conflic
|
||||
* **Contemporary Synthesis (Post-Debate):** Modern game studies has largely moved past this binary opposition toward a more integrated approach. Scholars now examine how mechanics and narrative are inextricably linked through concepts like *ludonarrative dissonance* (the conflict between gameplay actions and story beats) and *ludonarrative harmony*. Current research focuses on "procedural rhetoric"—how the rules of a game function as a form of argumentation—and how procedurality can be used to construct meaning, effectively merging the study of systems with the study of meaning-making.
|
||||
|
||||
🔗 Knowledge Connections
|
||||
* Related Topics: [[Procedural Rhetoric]], [[Ergodic Literature]], [[Ludonarrative Dissonance]], [[Cybertext Theory]]
|
||||
* Projects/Contexts: [[Digital Humanities]], [[Formalist Game Design]], [[Interactive Storytelling]]
|
||||
* Related Topics: [[Procedural Rhetoric|Procedural Rhetoric]], [[Ergodic Literature|Ergodic Literature]], [[Ludonarrative Dissonance|Ludonarrative Dissonance]], [[Cybertext Theory|Cybertext Theory]]
|
||||
* Projects/Contexts: [[Digital Humanities|Digital Humanities]], [[Formalist Game Design|Formalist Game Design]], [[Interactive Storytelling|Interactive Storytelling]]
|
||||
* Contradictions/Notes: While early scholars like Espen Aarseth and Marie-Laure Ryan represented opposing poles, contemporary scholarship views the distinction as a false dichotomy; most modern researchers study how mechanics *mediate* narrative.
|
||||
|
||||
Last updated: 2026-04-16
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user