---
id: wiki-2026-0508-snyk-checkmarx-endor-labs-등-종합-애
title: Snyk Checkmarx Endor Labs 등 종합 애플리케이션 보안 플랫폼
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
status: verified
canonical_id: self
aliases: [AppSec Platforms, ASPM, Application Security Platforms]
duplicate_of: none
source_trust_level: A
confidence_score: 0.9
verification_status: applied
tags: [appsec, security, sast, sca, aspm, snyk, checkmarx, endor-labs]
raw_sources: []
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
github_commit: pending
tech_stack:
  language: multi
  framework: snyk/checkmarx-one/endor-labs
---

# Snyk Checkmarx Endor Labs 등 종합 애플리케이션 보안 플랫폼

## 매 한 줄
> **"매 modern AppSec platform 의 SAST + SCA + IaC + secret + container + ASPM 의 unified surface — Snyk, Checkmarx One, Endor Labs, Semgrep AppSec Platform, GitHub Advanced Security 의 dominant"**. 매 2026 의 differentiator 의 AI auto-fix (Snyk DeepCode AI, Checkmarx AI Fix) + reachability analysis (Endor) + AI-generated code 의 auditing. 매 ASPM (Application Security Posture Management) 의 unification layer.

## 매 핵심

### 매 Coverage axes
- **SAST** (Static Analysis): 매 code 의 vuln pattern (SQLi, XSS, command inj).
- **SCA** (Software Composition Analysis): 매 dependency 의 known CVE.
- **IaC**: Terraform / K8s manifest 의 misconfig.
- **Secret**: 매 hardcoded credential.
- **Container**: image layer 의 CVE + base-image guidance.
- **DAST / API**: runtime / API 의 dynamic test.
- **ASPM**: 매 unified posture, 매 prioritization.

### 매 Vendor landscape (2026)
- **Snyk**: dev-friendly, AI auto-fix (DeepCode), open-source-first.
- **Checkmarx One**: enterprise SAST 의 history, AI Fix, IAST 추가.
- **Endor Labs**: 매 reachability-based SCA — 매 noise 의 dramatic 의 reduce.
- **Semgrep AppSec Platform**: 매 custom rule 의 first.
- **GitHub Advanced Security (CodeQL + Dependabot + Copilot Autofix)**: GitHub-native.
- **Veracode**, **SonarQube**, **Wiz Code**: 매 niche 의 own.

### 매 Modern (2026) trends
- **Reachability**: 매 vuln 의 actually called 의 filter (Endor, Semgrep).
- **AI auto-fix**: PR comment 의 fix suggestion → auto-apply.
- **AI-generated code 의 auditing**: 매 Copilot / Cursor 의 output 의 audit gate.
- **SBOM mandate**: 매 EU CRA / US EO 14028 의 compliance.

### 매 응용
1. 매 CI gate 의 SAST + SCA fail.
2. PR-level annotation + auto-fix.
3. ASPM dashboard 의 cross-tool aggregation.
4. SBOM gen + supply chain attestation (SLSA, in-toto).

## 💻 패턴

### Snyk CLI (CI gate)
```yaml
# .github/workflows/snyk.yml
name: snyk
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: snyk/actions/setup@master
      - run: snyk test --severity-threshold=high
        env: { SNYK_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SNYK_TOKEN }} }
      - run: snyk code test --severity-threshold=high
      - run: snyk container test myimg:latest
      - run: snyk iac test infra/
```

### Semgrep custom rule
```yaml
# .semgrep/no-eval.yml
rules:
  - id: no-eval
    pattern: eval(...)
    message: "Avoid eval — code injection risk"
    languages: [javascript, python]
    severity: ERROR
```
```bash
semgrep --config .semgrep/ --config p/owasp-top-ten --error
```

### Endor Labs reachability scan
```bash
endorctl init
endorctl scan --dependencies --reachability
# Output: 매 only 의 reachable vuln 의 alert — 매 90%+ noise reduction.
```

### CodeQL custom query
```ql
import javascript

from CallExpr c
where c.getCalleeName() = "exec"
  and c.getArgument(0).flowsFrom(any(VarAccess v | v.getVariable().getAName() = "userInput"))
select c, "Possible command injection from user input"
```

### SBOM generation + attestation (Syft + Cosign)
```bash
syft myimg:latest -o spdx-json > sbom.spdx.json
cosign attest --predicate sbom.spdx.json --type spdxjson myimg:latest
cosign verify-attestation --type spdxjson --certificate-identity ... myimg:latest
```

### Snyk AI Fix (PR auto-fix)
```python
# 매 PR 의 finding 의 Snyk DeepCode AI 의 fix patch 의 generate
# Snyk dashboard / CLI 의 --fix 의 use
# snyk fix --severity-threshold=high
```

### ASPM aggregation (custom)
```python
import requests
from collections import defaultdict

def fetch(api, token):
    return requests.get(api, headers={"Authorization": f"token {token}"}).json()

snyk = fetch("https://api.snyk.io/v1/org/.../issues", SNYK_TOKEN)
chx = fetch("https://api.checkmarx.net/...", CHX_TOKEN)
endor = fetch("https://api.endorlabs.com/...", ENDOR_TOKEN)

agg = defaultdict(list)
for src, items in [("snyk", snyk), ("chx", chx), ("endor", endor)]:
    for it in items["results"]:
        agg[(it["package"], it["cve"])].append({"src": src, **it})

# 매 prioritize: reachable + critical + exploitable
prioritized = sorted(agg.items(),
    key=lambda kv: (-any(x.get("reachable") for x in kv[1]),
                    -max(x.get("cvss", 0) for x in kv[1])))
```

### Pre-commit secret scan
```yaml
# .pre-commit-config.yaml
repos:
  - repo: https://github.com/gitleaks/gitleaks
    rev: v8.21.0
    hooks: [{ id: gitleaks }]
  - repo: https://github.com/trufflesecurity/trufflehog
    rev: v3.82.7
    hooks: [{ id: trufflehog, args: [--only-verified] }]
```

## 매 결정 기준
| 필요 | Tool |
|---|---|
| Dev-friendly all-in-one | Snyk |
| Enterprise SAST + IAST | Checkmarx One |
| Reachability-prioritized SCA | Endor Labs |
| Custom rule | Semgrep |
| GitHub-native | GHAS (CodeQL) |
| Open / cheap baseline | Trivy + Semgrep + Gitleaks |

**기본값**: Semgrep + Trivy (open) at minimum, 매 commercial pick by org need.

## 🔗 Graph
- 부모: [[Application-Security]] · [[CI/CD Pipeline & IDE Security Integration|DevSecOps]]
- 변형: [[Semgrep]]
- 응용: [[ASPM]] · [[SBOM]] · [[Supply-Chain-Security]]
- Adjacent: [[Smart-Contract-Auditing]] · [[CodeQL]] · [[Trivy]] · [[Gitleaks]]

## 🤖 LLM 활용
**언제**: finding triage, 매 fix patch suggest, 매 PR comment auto-generate, secure code review.
**언제 X**: deterministic detection (SAST faster + grounded), zero-day discovery (research).

## ❌ 안티패턴
- **No reachability**: 매 noise 의 99% — 매 dev fatigue.
- **Tool sprawl, no ASPM**: 매 finding duplicate / conflict.
- **No CI gate**: 매 finding 의 backlog 의 grow.
- **Secret 의 git history 의 leave**: 매 force-push + revoke 의 always.

## 🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Snyk, Checkmarx, Endor Labs docs, Gartner ASPM 2025).
- 신뢰도 A.

## 🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — full vendor landscape + ASPM patterns |
