---
id: wiki-2026-0508-deepcode-ai
title: DeepCode AI (Snyk Code)
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
status: verified
canonical_id: self
aliases: [DeepCode AI, Snyk Code, symbolic AI security, neuro-symbolic SAST, AI Fix]
duplicate_of: none
source_trust_level: B
confidence_score: 0.85
verification_status: applied
tags: [security, sast, snyk, deepcode, neuro-symbolic, ml-security, autofix, ai-code-analysis]
raw_sources: []
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
github_commit: pending
tech_stack:
  language: SaaS
  framework: Snyk Code / DeepCode
---

# DeepCode AI (Snyk Code)

## 매 한 줄
> **"매 LLM 의 X — 매 symbolic + neural 의 결합"**. 매 25M+ data flow + 매 19+ language. 매 interfile analysis. 매 commit-based 의 verified fix pattern. 매 modern hybrid 의 example (vs LLM-only Corgea).

## 매 핵심 differentiator

### Hybrid AI (vs LLM-only)
- 매 symbolic reasoning + 매 NN.
- 매 semantic representation 의 build.
- 매 hallucination ↓.
- 매 interpretable.

### Interfile dataflow
- 매 file boundary 의 cross.
- 매 multi-module vulnerability 의 catch.

### Commit-based fix pattern
- 매 OSS 의 actual fix commits 의 학습.
- 매 verified pattern.
- 매 LLM hallucination 의 avoid.

### 매 history
- 매 2017 ETH spinoff (DeepCode).
- 매 2020 Snyk 의 acquire.
- 매 2024 DeepCode AI Fix.

### 매 Snyk 의 stack
- **Snyk Code** (DeepCode-powered SAST).
- **Snyk Open Source** (SCA).
- **Snyk Container** (image scan).
- **Snyk IaC** (Terraform / K8s).

### 매 vs alternative
| Tool | Approach | Strength |
|---|---|---|
| Snyk Code (DeepCode) | Hybrid neuro-symbolic | Verified fix + low FP |
| Corgea | LLM-native | Business logic + autofix |
| Semgrep | Pattern + custom | Speed + control |
| SonarQube | Rule-based + AI | Quality gate |
| GitHub Advanced | Code scanning + Copilot Autofix | GitHub integration |

### 매 limitation
- 매 LLM-native 의 emerging features (Corgea) 의 less.
- 매 enterprise SaaS pricing.
- 매 language-specific depth varies.

## 💻 패턴 (응용 — Snyk integration)

### CLI scan
```bash
npm install -g snyk
snyk auth
snyk code test                  # 매 SAST
snyk code test --json           # 매 JSON output
snyk code test --severity-threshold=high
```

### CI integration
```yaml
- name: Snyk Code
  uses: snyk/actions/node@master
  env: { SNYK_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SNYK_TOKEN }} }
  with:
    command: code test
    args: --severity-threshold=high --sarif-file-output=snyk-code.sarif

- name: Upload SARIF
  uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
  with: { sarif_file: snyk-code.sarif }
```

### IDE integration
```
- VS Code: Snyk Security extension.
- IntelliJ / WebStorm: Snyk plugin.
- 매 inline 의 finding + fix 의 click.
```

### DeepCode AI Fix workflow
```
1. Vulnerability detected (e.g., SQL injection).
2. AI Fix 의 verified pattern 의 retrieve.
3. PR comment 의 diff 의 propose.
4. Developer 의 review + merge.
5. Snyk 의 re-test 의 confirm fix.
```

### Multi-tool layered security
```yaml
security_pipeline:
  pre_commit:
    - gitleaks  # 매 secret
  
  pr:
    - snyk_code  # 매 SAST (DeepCode)
    - snyk_open_source  # 매 SCA (CVE)
    - semgrep  # 매 custom rule
    - corgea  # 매 LLM-native (optional, parallel)
  
  pre_deploy:
    - snyk_container  # 매 image
    - cosign  # 매 sign
  
  runtime:
    - falco
```

### Custom rule (Snyk + Semgrep complementary)
```yaml
# 매 .snyk policy
ignore:
  'SNYK-CC-K8S-1':
    - '*':
        reason: 'Internal dev cluster — non-prod'
        expires: '2026-12-31T00:00:00Z'

# 매 semgrep for org-specific
rules:
  - id: internal-deprecated-api
    pattern: oldClient.deprecatedMethod(...)
    message: Use newClient instead.
    severity: WARNING
```

### Vulnerability triage
```python
def triage_findings(snyk_findings):
    triaged = []
    for f in snyk_findings:
        priority = (
            f['severity_score'] *
            f['exploit_maturity_factor'] *  # 매 0.5-2
            f['reachability_factor']         # 매 0.3-1.5
        )
        triaged.append({
            **f,
            'priority': priority,
            'sla_hours': sla_for_severity(f['severity']),
        })
    return sorted(triaged, key=lambda x: -x['priority'])
```

### Auto-fix verification
```python
def verify_fix(original_code, ai_proposed_fix):
    # 매 1. syntax check
    if not parses_correctly(ai_proposed_fix): return 'invalid syntax'
    
    # 매 2. test still passes
    if not run_tests(ai_proposed_fix): return 'tests fail'
    
    # 매 3. vulnerability resolved
    if scan(ai_proposed_fix).has_vuln: return 'vuln remains'
    
    # 매 4. no new vuln introduced
    new_vulns = set(scan(ai_proposed_fix).vulns) - set(scan(original_code).vulns)
    if new_vulns: return f'introduces new: {new_vulns}'
    
    return 'verified'
```

### SARIF (standard output)
```python
import json

def parse_sarif(sarif_file):
    with open(sarif_file) as f:
        data = json.load(f)
    
    findings = []
    for run in data['runs']:
        for result in run['results']:
            findings.append({
                'rule': result['ruleId'],
                'severity': result['level'],
                'message': result['message']['text'],
                'file': result['locations'][0]['physicalLocation']['artifactLocation']['uri'],
                'line': result['locations'][0]['physicalLocation']['region']['startLine'],
            })
    return findings
```

### Suppress false positives
```js
// 매 Snyk 의 inline ignore
function safe_html(input) {
  // snyk-ignore: javascript/xss — 매 input 의 sanitized at boundary
  return `<div>${input}</div>`;
}
```

## 매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Tool |
|---|---|
| Mid-large + budget | Snyk Code (DeepCode) |
| AI-native focus | Corgea |
| Custom rules speed | Semgrep |
| Open-source self-host | SemGrep |
| GitHub native | GitHub Advanced Security |
| Enterprise compliance | Veracode / Checkmarx |

**기본값**: 매 Snyk + Semgrep complementary.

## 🔗 Graph
- 부모: [[SAST]] · [[CI_CD 파이프라인 및 IDE 통합 보안|DevSecOps]]
- 변형: [[Snyk-Code]] · [[Symbolic-AI]] · [[Hybrid-AI]] · [[Neural-Symbolic-Integration|Neuro-Symbolic-AI]]
- 응용: [[Corgea]] · [[Semgrep]] · [[SonarQube]] · [[CI_CD 파이프라인 및 IDE 통합 보안]]
- Adjacent: [[AI 코드 리뷰 및 보안 취약점 점검(DevSecOps)]] · [[Custom-ESLint-Rules-Development]] · [[CodeScene]] · [[AI 생성 코드 검증(AI Code Assurance)]]

## 🤖 LLM 활용
**언제**: 매 enterprise SAST. 매 multi-language. 매 verified autofix.
**언제 X**: 매 budget-tight (Semgrep). 매 air-gapped.

## ❌ 안티패턴
- **Single tool**: 매 layered defense X.
- **No triage**: 매 alert fatigue.
- **AI Fix 의 blind merge**: 매 verify 의 still 필요.
- **No SARIF integration**: 매 dashboard 의 single source X.

## 🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Snyk docs, DeepCode papers, ETH spinoff history).
- 신뢰도 B.
- Related: [[Corgea]] · [[CI_CD 파이프라인 및 IDE 통합 보안]] · [[Custom-ESLint-Rules-Development]] · [[CodeScene]].

## 🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — neuro-symbolic + 매 CI / SARIF / triage / verify code |
