---
id: w3css-validation
title: "W3CSS Validation"
category: "Programming_Language"
status: "draft"
verification_status: "conceptual"
canonical_id: ""
aliases: ["CSS validation", "vendor prefixes", "W3.CSS 검증"]
duplicate_of: ""
source_trust_level: "B"
confidence_score: 0.84
created_at: 2026-07-04
updated_at: 2026-07-04
review_reason: ""
merge_history: []
tags: ["w3css", "css-framework", "w3schools", "validation", "vendor-prefixes"]
raw_sources: ["https://www.w3schools.com/w3css/w3css_validation.asp"]
applied_in: []
github_commit: ""
---

# [[W3CSS Validation]]

## 🎯 한 줄 통찰 (One-line insight)
Running W3.CSS through the official W3C CSS Validator will legitimately produce WARNINGS (not just clean output) precisely BECAUSE W3.CSS deliberately uses vendor-prefixed properties (`-webkit-`, `-moz-`, `-o-`, `-ms-`) to support older browsers — meaning "validation warnings" here are an intentional backward-compatibility tradeoff, not a defect to be fixed. [S1]

## 🧠 핵심 개념 (Core concepts)
- **W3C CSS Validation Service** — an official W3C tool for checking CSS correctness against CSS1–CSS4 specs. [S1]
- **Vendor extensions** — non-standard, browser-specific property prefixes used to simulate newer CSS features before they were formally standardized/supported everywhere. [S1]
- **Prefix-to-browser mapping** — `-webkit-` (Chrome, Safari, Opera), `-moz-` (Firefox), `-o-` (old Opera), `-ms-` (Edge/IE). [S1]
- **Warnings as intentional tradeoff** — the validator flags vendor-prefixed rules as warnings, but W3.CSS retains them anyway to maximize legacy-browser compatibility, planning to remove them only once browser vendors themselves phase out prefix requirements. [S1]

## 📖 세부 내용 (Details)
- The four vendor prefix families are listed as a direct browser-compatibility mapping: `-webkit-` / `-moz-` / `-o-` / `-ms-`. [S1]
- The source frames prefix removal as browser vendors' own responsibility ("Browser vendors are working to stop using prefixes in future browser versions"), not something W3.CSS controls unilaterally. [S1]

## ⚖️ 모순 및 업데이트 (Contradictions & updates)
- **검증 경고 = 결함이 아님**: W3C 검증 도구가 벤더 확장 프리픽스에 대해 경고를 내더라도, 이는 구형 브라우저 지원을 위한 의도적 선택이지 수정해야 할 버그가 아니라는 점이 명시적으로 설명됨. [S1]

## 🛠️ 적용 사례 (Applied in summary)
현재 발견된 실제 적용 사례가 없습니다 — 벤더 프리픽스별 브라우저 매핑표가 실전에서 CSS 호환성 이슈를 진단할 때 참조 자료로 활용 가능하다. [S1]

## 💻 코드 패턴 (Code patterns)
Vendor-prefixed CSS property illustrating the backward-compatibility tradeoff:
```css
.example {
  -webkit-transform: rotate(45deg); /* Chrome, Safari, Opera */
  -moz-transform: rotate(45deg);    /* Firefox */
  -ms-transform: rotate(45deg);     /* Edge, IE */
  transform: rotate(45deg);         /* Standard */
}
```

## ✅ 검증 상태 및 신뢰도
- **상태:** draft
- **검증 단계:** conceptual
- **출처 신뢰도:** B (W3Schools — widely used educational reference, not a primary standards body)
- **신뢰 점수:** 0.84
- **중복 검사 결과:** 신규 생성 (New discovery)

## 🔗 지식 그래프 (Knowledge Graph)
- **상위/루트:** [[W3.CSS Tutorial]]
- **관련 개념:** [[W3CSS Material]], [[W3CSS Versions]]
- **참조 맥락:** 프레임워크 내부 구현 방침 설명 — 버전 히스토리(Versions) 챕터로 이어짐.

## 📚 출처 (Sources)
- [S1] W3Schools — W3.CSS Validation — https://www.w3schools.com/w3css/w3css_validation.asp

## 📝 변경 이력 (Change history)
- 2026-07-04: Initial draft synthesized from the W3Schools "W3.CSS Validation" page (Astra wiki-curation, P-Reinforce v3.1 format).
