---
id: wiki-2026-0508-아키텍처-패턴-지식
title: 아키텍처 패턴 지식
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
status: verified
canonical_id: self
aliases: [Architecture Patterns, Architectural Styles]
duplicate_of: none
source_trust_level: A
confidence_score: 0.9
verification_status: applied
tags: [architecture, patterns, design]
raw_sources: []
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
github_commit: pending
tech_stack:
  language: agnostic
  framework: agnostic
---

# 아키텍처 패턴 지식

## 매 한 줄
> **"매 architectural pattern 은 매 recurring problem 의 매 reusable solution 으로, 매 trade-off 가 매 명시되어야 한다"**. Buschmann 의 매 POSA series (1996) 이래로, 매 modern catalog (Richards/Ford 2020, Vernon 2021) 는 매 microservices, event-driven, hexagonal, modular monolith, serverless 를 매 핵심으로 다룬다.

## 매 핵심

### 매 6 fundamental styles
- **Layered (n-tier)**: presentation / business / data.
- **Pipe & filter**: 매 streaming transformation chain.
- **Microkernel (plugin)**: 매 core + 매 extension.
- **Service-based**: 매 monolith → 매 coarse-grained services.
- **Event-driven (broker / mediator)**: 매 async pub/sub.
- **Space-based**: 매 in-memory data grid + 매 messaging.

### 매 modern patterns
- **Hexagonal (Ports & Adapters)**: 매 domain 매 framework-independent.
- **Clean Architecture**: 매 dependency rule (outward → inward).
- **CQRS**: 매 read / write 분리.
- **Event Sourcing**: 매 state = 매 event sequence.
- **Saga**: 매 distributed transaction via 매 compensation.
- **BFF (Backend for Frontend)**: 매 client-specific gateway.

### 매 응용
1. 매 quality attribute → 매 pattern 매 mapping.
2. 매 ADR 에서 매 chosen pattern 명시.
3. 매 fitness function 으로 매 pattern adherence 검증.

## 💻 패턴

### Hexagonal (TypeScript)
```typescript
// domain/order.ts (pure)
export class Order { confirm(): Order { /*...*/ } }

// app/ports.ts
export interface OrderRepo { save(o: Order): Promise<void>; }
export interface PaymentGate { charge(amt: number): Promise<string>; }

// app/place-order.ts (use case)
export class PlaceOrder {
  constructor(private repo: OrderRepo, private pay: PaymentGate) {}
  async run(cart: Cart): Promise<Order> {
    const txn = await this.pay.charge(cart.total);
    const order = new Order(cart, txn).confirm();
    await this.repo.save(order);
    return order;
  }
}

// infra/postgres-order-repo.ts (adapter)
export class PgOrderRepo implements OrderRepo { /*...*/ }
```

### Event-driven (Kafka, Java)
```java
@KafkaListener(topics = "orders.placed")
public void onOrderPlaced(OrderPlacedEvent e) {
    inventoryService.reserve(e.items());
    kafka.send("inventory.reserved",
        new InventoryReservedEvent(e.orderId(), e.items()));
}
```

### CQRS (.NET 9)
```csharp
public record PlaceOrderCommand(Guid Id, List<Item> Items);
public record OrderSummaryQuery(Guid Id);

public class CommandHandler : IRequestHandler<PlaceOrderCommand, Unit> {
    public async Task<Unit> Handle(PlaceOrderCommand cmd, CancellationToken ct) {
        await writeDb.SaveAsync(new Order(cmd));
        await bus.PublishAsync(new OrderPlaced(cmd.Id));
        return Unit.Value;
    }
}

public class QueryHandler : IRequestHandler<OrderSummaryQuery, OrderSummary> {
    public Task<OrderSummary> Handle(OrderSummaryQuery q, CancellationToken ct)
        => readReplica.GetAsync<OrderSummary>(q.Id);
}
```

### Saga (orchestration, Temporal)
```python
@workflow.defn
class CheckoutWorkflow:
    @workflow.run
    async def run(self, order: Order) -> str:
        try:
            payment = await workflow.execute_activity(charge, order)
            inv = await workflow.execute_activity(reserve, order)
            ship = await workflow.execute_activity(ship, order)
            return ship.tracking_id
        except ActivityError:
            await workflow.execute_activity(refund, payment)
            await workflow.execute_activity(release_inventory, inv)
            raise
```

### Modular Monolith (Spring Modulith)
```java
@Modulith(systemName = "Shop", sharedModules = "shared")
@SpringBootApplication
public class ShopApp { }

// inventory/InventoryService.java — package-private
@ApplicationModuleListener
void on(OrderPlaced e) { reserve(e.items()); }
```

## 매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Pattern |
|---|---|
| 매 startup, single team | Modular monolith |
| 매 read >> write | CQRS |
| 매 audit / temporal queries | Event Sourcing |
| 매 cross-service workflow | Saga (Temporal / orchestration) |
| 매 polyglot frontends | BFF |
| 매 high event throughput | Event-driven (Kafka) |

**기본값**: 매 modular monolith 시작 → 매 evidence 기반 매 split.

## 🔗 Graph
- 부모: [[소프트웨어 아키텍처 설계]]
- 변형: [[Microservices]] · [[Modular Monolith]] · [[Hexagonal Architecture]]
- 응용: [[CQRS]] · [[Event Sourcing]] · [[Saga]] · [[BFF]]
- Adjacent: [[DDD]] · [[Clean Architecture]]

## 🤖 LLM 활용
**언제**: 매 pattern selection rationale / 매 trade-off 비교 / 매 boilerplate generation.
**언제 X**: 매 final architecture decision — 매 senior architect review 필수.

## ❌ 안티패턴
- **Pattern over-application**: 매 모든 곳 매 microservice.
- **Mixing CQRS + sync read-after-write**: 매 consistency expectation 위반.
- **Saga without compensation test**: 매 partial failure 매 silent.
- **Hexagonal in name only**: 매 domain 매 framework annotations 의 침투.

## 🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Richards & Ford, *Software Architecture: The Hard Parts*; Vernon, *Strategic Monoliths and Microservices*; Buschmann, *POSA Vol 1*).
- 신뢰도 A.

## 🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — hexagonal/CQRS/saga/modulith 패턴 추가 |
